An Analysis of the Concept of Love in Proust and Stendhal with Emphasis on the Classical and Modern Conceptions of Consciousness

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate Professor of French Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch

Abstract

One of the main themes of Proust’s In Search of Lost Time is that of love and it can be claimed that other themes in the novel take on meaning in their relation to this central theme. Even though in the analysis of love that he presents in this work Proust has been influenced by Stendhal’s insights in his work On Love – and naturally there are common points between the two views – we should not ignore the basic difference that distinguishes them. This difference can be grasped through the difference between two conceptions of consciousness: first, a classical conception which is based on Descartes’ interpretation of consciousness, and the other a modern one which is connected to Merleau-Ponty’s understanding, among others. Presenting these two conceptions and introducing Proust’s analysis of love by comparing it with Stendhal’s insights, the present study will demonstrate the ways in which these different conceptions of consciousness can help us in analysing the essential and fundamental difference between Proust’s and Stendhal’s analyses of love.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

برکت، ب. ۱۳۷۵. «مارسل پروست و نشانه­ها». فصلنامه ارغنون، (3)9 و 10: 321- 330.
معین، م. 1394. معنا به‌مثابه تجربه زیسته؛ گذر از نشانه‌شناسی کلاسیک به نشانه‌شناسی با دورنمای پدیدارشناختی، تهران: انتشارات سخن.
Collot , M. 2005. la poésie moderne et la strucyure d’horizon, Paris: Puf.
Deleuze, G. 1964. Proust et les signes, Paris: Quadrige.
D’ormesson, G. 1997. Une autre histoire de la littérature française, Paris: Nil Edition.
Grimaldi, N. 2010. Essai sur la jalousie,l’enfer proustien, Paris: Puf.
Husserl , E. 1931. Méditations cartésiennes, Paris: Colin.
 ________. 1966. Méditation cartésiennes, intoroduction à la phénoménologie, trad:Garbielle peiffer,et E. Levinas. Paris: Librarie philosophique J.Vrin.
__________. 1970. Expérience et jugement, Paris: Puf.
Landowski, E. 2004. Passions sans noms, Paris: Puf.
Maurois, A. 1965. De Proust à Camus, Paris: Librairie académique perrin.  
Merleau–ponty, M. 1945. “Phénoménologie de la perception”. Bibliothèque des idées,  Paris: Gallimard.
_______________. 1964. “le visible et l’invisible”. Bibliothèque des idées,  Paris: Gallimard.
_______________.1948. Causeries, Paris: Le seuil.
_______________. 1994. “la nature. notes, cours du collège de France”. Traces écrites, Paris: Le Seuil.
Milly, J. 2011. “Lever de rideau amoureux chez Proust”. in Au seuil de la modernité: Proust, Literature and the Arts, “Le Romantisme et après en France / Romanticism and after in France, 15”. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Proust, M. 1971. Jean Santeuil, Paris: Gallimard.
_________. 1999. A la recherché du temps perdu, Paris: Gallimard.
Sparvoly, E. 2010. “Syndrome mélancolique et dérèglement moral chez les amoureux proustiens”. in Cahiers de Littérature française. Morales de Proust. dirigé par Mariolina Bertini et Antoine Compagnon: IX-X.
Sartre, J.P. 2000. l’imagination, Paris: Puf.
Stendhal. 1927. De l’amour. Révision du texte et préface par Henri Martineau.
Paris: Le divan. 
Literary Theory and Criticism
Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3
Serial 3
January 2018
Pages 33-52

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics