Mimesis and Narrative from Platonic Dialogues to Modern Closet Dramas

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Comparative and Analytical History of Islamic Art, University of the Arts Tehran

2 Associate Professor at the Department of Drama, Faculty of Cinema and Theatre, University of the Arts Tehran

3 Associate Professor at the Department of Drama, Faculty of Cinema and Theatre, University of the Arts Tehran-

Abstract

Even though in philosophical studies the Platonic dialogues have always been an area for investigation, little attention has been paid to their dramatic aspects. Since Plato was an opponent of the mimetic arts, in particular theatre and drama, narrative has been given priority in his works. Therefore, his dialogues can be measured against the criteria of narrative drama. In the modern period, narrative drama gained popularity in Europe and was recognized as closet drama. The present article studies the mimetic and narrative features of such dramas and compares them with Platonic dialogues. First, the concepts of mimesis and narrative are described and, then, Plato’s ideas on these concepts are explained. Plato’s views on tragedy and comedy have also been specifically studied. We have, then, concentrated on the place of theatre in the modern period and among non-mimetic arts – an outcome of which is closet drama. In interpreting closet dramas, Gertrude Stein’s Four Saints in Three Acts as well as the overall structure of the plays of Bertolt Brecht and Samuel Beckett, two modernist playwrights, have been examined. Finally, by extracting the features of closet drama and comparing them with Plato’s dialogues, we arrive at the coordinates of Platonic dialogues as a dramatic type.

Keywords

Main Subjects


ارسطو. 1381.  فن شعر، ترجمه ع. زرین‌کوب. تهران: امیرکبیر.
افلاطون. 1353. جمهوری، ترجمه م.ح. لطفی. تهران: ابن سینا.
ـــــــ . 1367. دوره آثار افلاطون، ترجمه م.ح. لطفی و ر.کاویانی. تهران: خوارزمی.
ــــــ . 1390. دوره آثار افلاطون، ترجمه م.ح. لطفی و ر.کاویانی. ج 1. تهران: خوارزمی.
برشت، ب. 1351. عظمت و انحطاط شهر ماهاگونی، ترجمه م. ملک‌خانی و م. اسفندیارفرد. تهران: امیرکبیر.
دهخدا، ع.ا . 1373. لغت‌نامه، تهران: مؤسسه انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران.
راسل، ب. 1340. تاریخ فلسفه غرب، ترجمه ن. دریابندری. ج 1. تهران: شرکت سهامی کتاب‌های جیبی.
شاپوری، س. 1394. تراژدی در آثار افلاطون، تهران: افراز.
 
لائرتیوس، د. 1387. حیات فیلسوفان نامدار: سقراط و افلاطون،ترجمه ح. کلباسی اشتری. تهران: مؤسسه فرهنگی دانش و اندیشه معاصر.
وات، ا. 1379. پیدایی قصه: پژوهش‌هایی درباره دیفو، ریچاردسون، فیلدینگ. ترجمه ن. سرمد. تهران: نشر علم.
Arieti, J.A. 1991. Interpreting Plato: The Dialogues as Drama, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Auerbach, E. 1953. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Chatman, S. 1990. Coming to Terms: The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Edwards, P. 1976. “Mimesis”. in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Macmillian.
Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nightingale, A.W. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nünning, A. & Sommer, R. 2008. “Diegetic and Mimetic Narrativity: Some Furthur Steps towards a Transgeneric Narratology of Drama”. Theorizing Narrativity, Berlin: De Gruyter. 331-354.
Puchner, M. 2010. The Drama of Ideas, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, B. 2007. “Drama and Narrative”. in D. Herman (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, G. 1949. Last Opera and Plays, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
_______. 2015. “Four Saints in Three Acts”. My KPFA – A Historical Footnote, from www.kpfahistory.com.
Tatarkiewicz, W. 1973. “Mimesis”, inPhilip Wiener (ed.). Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas, New York: Scribner. 225-230.