The Methodology of Biography Writing in Mystical Literature Case Study: Attar Neyshabouri’s Tadhkirat al-Awliya

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Urmia University

2 PhD Candidate in Persian Language and Literature, Urmia University

Abstract

Biography is a written account of the dimensions of a historical figure’s life. Therefore, it is now regarded as one of the main and effective components in the fields of literary and historical studies. Considering the various patterns and methods used to write biographies among different nations, one can pose the following questions: What principles and rules are biographies based on, and what categories are they required to consider in the domains of epistemology and ontology? What scientific place and stylistic features do mystical biographies have? And what sources and types of knowledge are used in the writing and concretization of these kinds of biographies? In this study of the methodology of mystical biographies, we have reviewed Tadhkirat al-Awliya,one of the most prominent texts of mystical prose. As a response to the above-mentioned question, we have tried to provide a general overview of the literary, mystical, and historical nature of this work by utilizing new literary theories and analyzing its vast epistemic dimensions. Moreover, we have explained the role of biographical principles and how they are used by Attar in formulating literary and mystical propositions.
  
Extended Abstract
 
1. Introduction
Islamic mysticism revolves around the individual and social conduct of human beings. Mystical biographies in Islamic literature were originally written in Arabic and developed in a systematic way. Then, as a result, this kind of biography found its way into Persian literature. Using a limited number of his narrative elements, Attar chose elements that would help him make the different stages and hierarchy of mysticism reasonable to the readers. Tadhkiratal-Awliya is a valuable mystical-literary work in which the teachings and details of the mystical life of the great figures of Islamic mysticism are explained. The narration and power of expression, the spirituality governing the text, and Attar's mystical interpretations and perceptions of the attitudes and conduct of the awliya are among the elements that reconstruct the story of the awliya.
 
2. Theoretical Framework
Biography is a written account of different dimensions of the lives of historical figures. In the present article new literary theories are employed to analyze the structures and principles of biography writing. Attar describes the lives of the awliya in the form of short narratives in special narrative forms. While the new rules of biography writing are followed, Attar pays special attention to the moral and emotaional apsects of the awliya.
 
3. Methodology
The present study employs the qualitative content analysis method to analyze different aspects of the writer’s mind. First, Tadhkiratal-Awliya is examined as a biographical work using specific approaches in literary criticism. Then, the fundamental concepts of the book are analyzed and the structural and epistemological rules are explained.
 
4. Findings
In Tadhkiratal-Awliya propositions containing profound epistemic and mystical meanings are closely intertwined with the literary language. Attar relies on intuition to recreate the mystical states and experience. He depicts the conduct of characters skillfully such that there is a causal relationship between the elements, and events occur in a specific time sequence. He connects seemingly unrelated mystical ideas, sometimes by identifying himself with the characters, in a way that they seem quite reasonable to the readers.
 
5. Conclusion
We have tried to provide a general overview of the literary, mystical, and historical nature of Tadhkiratal-Awliya by employing new literary theories and analyzing different epistemic dimensions of this work. Thus, attempt has been made to explain the role of autobiographical principles, and how they are used by Attar, in formulating literary and mystical propositions. To recreate mystical states and experiences Attar mostly draws on intuition and persistence in different mystical moments. He uses his powerful expression, which dervies from his mystical experience and observation, in his literary expression and thus makes the lives and mental states of the saints understandable.
 

Main Subjects


Ahmadi, B. 1377 [1998]. Chahar Gozaresh as Tadhkirat al-Awliya. Tehran: Markaz.
Alizadeh, N. & Aidinlou, S. 1386 [2007]. “Bazshensi-e Mazmun-e Hemasi-Asatiri ‘Rouyarooyi Pedar va Pesar’ dar Revayati az Tadhkirat al-Awliya.” Pazhuheshha-ye Adabi 12&13: 191-208.
Anvar Shandarov, L. 1381 [2002]. “Barresi-e No’e Adabi Tadhkirat al-Awliya bar Mabna-ye Tadhkirat al-Awliya-ye Attar.”  A. Roohbakhshan (trans.). Ma’aref 2 (18): 114-152.
Aristotle. 1369 [1991]. Fann-e She’r. A. Zarrinkub (trans.). Tehran: Amirkabir.
Attar Neyshabouri, F. 2000. Muslim Saints and Mystics, Episodes from the Tadhkirat al-Awliya (Memorial of the Saints), A. J. Arberry (trans.), OMPHALOSKEPSIS.
_____. 1385 [2006]. Manteq ul-Tayr. M. Shafiee Kadkani (ed.). Tehran: Sokhan.
_____. 1385 [2006]. Tadhkirat al-Awliya. R. Nicholson (ed.). Tehran: Hermes.
Avicenna. 1389 [2010]. Isharat va Tanbihat. H. Malekshahi. Tehran: Soroush.
Binazir, N. & Tali’ehbakhsh, M. 1394 [2015]. “Tahlil-e Olgooye Ostureh-i Erfani az Shakhsiyat-e Rabe’eh Adaviyah ba Takiyeh bar Revayt-e Tadhkirat al-Awliya.” Adabyat-e Erfani 7 (13): 7-39.
Doloughan, F. J. 2011. Contemporary Narrative. British Library Document Supply Centre.
Forouzanfar, B. 1353 [1975]. Sharh-e Ahval va Naqd va Tahlil-e Asar-e Attar. Tehran: Dehkhoda.
Jami, A. 1371 [1992]. Nafahat ul-Ons fi Hazarat ul-Qods. M. Abedi (ed.). Tehran: Ettela’at.
Katz, A. 1383 [2004]. Sakhtgarayi-e Sonnat va Erfan, Pazhuheshi dar Zaminehmandi-ye Tajrobeh-ye Erfani. A. Anzali (trans.). Qom: Ayat-e Eshq.
Khazaifar, A. 1385 [2006]. “Realism Jadooyi dar Tadhkirat al-Awliya.” Nameh-ye Farhangestan 25 (7): 6-21.
Martin, W. 1392 [2013]. Nazaryeh-ha-ye Revayat. M. Shahba (trans.). Tehran: Hermes.
Mirsadeqi, J. 1367 [1988]. Anasor-e Dastan. Tehran: Shafa.
Nozhat, B. 1392 [2013]. “Tarkib-e Sakhtari va Darunmayeh-ha-ye Erfani-e Masnavi Mosibatnameh.” Adabyat-e Erfani 7 (4): 135-159.
Nwyia, P. 1374 [1995]. Tafsir-e Qur’ani va Zaban-e Erfani. I. Sa'adat (trans.). Tehran: Markaz-e Nashr-e Daneshgahi.
Palmer, A. 1370 [1991]. Elm-e Hermeneutic. M.S. Hanayi Kashani (trans.). Tehran: Hermes.
Payandeh, H. 1389 [2010]. “Vojudshenasi-e Pasamodern dar Dastani az Yek Nevesandeh-ye Irani.” Zaban va Adab-e Farsi 44 (14): 29-42.
Pournamdarian, T. 1390 [2011]. Didar ba Simorgh. Tehran: Pazhuheshgah-e Olum-e Ensani va Motale’at-e Farhangi.
Proudfoot, W. 1377 [1998]. Tajrobeh-ye Dini. A. Yazdani (trans.). Qom: Taha
Pourjavadi, N. 1387 [2008]. “Tadhkirat al-Awliya.” In: Daneshnameh-ye Zaban va Adab-e Farsi. Tehran: Farhangestan-e Zaban va Adab-e Farsi.
Qafelehbashi, A. & Behrooz, Z. 1387 [2008]. “Naqd-e Rikhtshenasi-e Hekayatha-ye Kashf ul-Mahjub va Tadhkirat al-Awliya.” Pazhuheshha-ye Adabi 5 (18): 117-140.
Rozatian, M & Madani, F. 1397 [2018]. “Barresi va Moqayeseh-ye Janbeh-ha-ye Ta’limi-e do Mafhum-e Ensaf va Eshq dar Tadhkirat al-Awliya va Manteq ol-Tayr-e Attar.” Pazhuhesh-nameh-ye Adabyat-e Ta’limi 9 (33): 61-90.
Scholes, R. 1394 [2015]. Daramadi bar Sakhtargarai dar Adabyat. F. Taheri (trans.) Tehran: Agah.
Shafi’ee Kadkani, M. 1386 [2007]. Musiqi-e She’r. Tehran: Agah.
Schimmel, A. 1384 [2005]. Ab’ad-e Erfani-e Eslam. A. Govahi, (trans.) Tehran: Daftar-e Nashr-e Eslami.
Tadie, J. 1391 [2012]. Naqd-e Adabi dar Qarn-e Bistom. M. Nonahali (trans.). Tehran: Niloufar.
Wellek, R. 1383 [2004]. Nazaryeh-ye Adabyat. Z. Movahed & P. Mohajer (trans.). Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi.
Zarghani, M. & Ghorban Sabbagh, M. 1396 [2017]. Nazaryeh-ye Zhanr. Tehran: Hermes.
Zaymaran, M. 1380 [2001]. Gozar az Jahan-e Ostureh beh Falsafeh. Tehran: Hermes.