نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
2 دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
3 استاد زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The text and the way of communicating with the audience is an issue that has attracted the attention of thinkers since ancient times and has led to the formation of various and sometimes contradictory opinions regarding text, communication, and the nuances of speaking. Contemporary schools and theories such as "the death of the author theory," "the reader-response theory," "the text-centered literary theory," etc., are among these opinions that have emerged concerning text and its understanding and reception by the audience. De Beaugrande and Dressler are linguists who, considering previous approaches, introduced seven criteria for analyzing a text as a communicative event. "Acceptability" or the "reception" of a text by the audience is one of these criteria. Yadollah Royaei is a groundbreaking poet in contemporary Iranian literature. His poetry, written in the form of "Hajm" poetry, has sparked many supporters and opponents. Therefore, this research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach to examine acceptability in two selected poems from Royaei's collections " Seventy Tombstones " and " Overflowing " based on De Beaugrande and Dressler's theory. The results indicate that, according to this theory, the selected poem from " Seventy Tombstones " has greater acceptability among the audience compared to the selected poem from " Overflowing."
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)